12/28/2023 0 Comments A mad artoonA perpetrator will be immediately identified and targeted with a devastating counterstrike. Others will cite a nuclear adversary's inescapable accountability for an attack through the positive attribution of a weapon's launch or delivery. Given their histories and traditions, those cultures are probably more adept at continued functionality in the absence of amenities and infrastructure than the US. Command economies, long range planning, hardened grids, and stability of centralized leadership further aid their societies in surviving any potential EMP attack. But the electrical infrastructure designs of Russia and others have spared no expense in applying Cold War civil defense lessons. Some may seek to minimize the risks of any nuclear weapons employment because all nations will suffer equally, reinforcing MAD deterrence. With similar confidence in the US nuclear umbrella Secessionists on the Taiwan island pursue secession in disregard of China's sovereignty. The assumed reliability of MAD has animated the US-supported Ukrainian leadership to disregard Russia's perspectives. Rational nations know that all humanity would suffer planetary devastation and a horrible aftermath in a kinetic nuclear war, and these aspects of MAD still serve as deterrence. Nuclear powers are repelled by memories of the US nuclear bombings in Japan that incinerated two cities and well over one hundred thousand people. Nuclear conflict was not only possible, but perhaps more likely. However, Russia and others remain skeptical of the new US-led world order. US' civilian and military systems remain vulnerable to EMP nearly two decades later due to Washington's continued faith in MAD. Nevertheless, other funding priorities took precedence. Even non-state and rogue state actors could defeat the US with only a small number of EMP weapons. Experts contended that an EMP would cause nationwide electrical grid anomalies, cascading systems failures, and ultimately unravel the fabric of American society. Sensing strategic neglect, in 2004 Congress became concerned for the unique threat posed by nuclear weapons-generated high altitude electromagnetic pulse (EMP). Instead, the US appointed itself the task of world policeman, enforcing its foreign policy ideals with conventional general purpose and special operations expeditionary forces. Funds were diverted from strategic capabilities as the probability of nuclear war seemed negligible. Considering the likelihood that the Biden Administration was misinformed, the sincerity of Russian leaders should be given the benefit of a doubt.Īfter the Cold War the US cashed in what it called a peace dividend. However, even after Russia was lectured by the US, Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, emphasized that Russia is not bluffing. An emboldened Taiwan island could conceivably take a lesson from Ukraine and declare its independence from China. Under an umbrella of US MAD deterrence, Ukraine assumes it can now crush Russian aims with modern US conventional weapons and take back what it claims to be its own. MAD contributed to its Cold War victory, and it is assumed to still be effective today. The US retains faith in the doctrine of mutual assured destruction(MAD). The US dismissed the warning as a bluff and threatened Russia by stating the use of such weapons would be met with unspecified "devastating" consequences. Russian President Vladimir Putin has suggested that Russia is prepared to employ nuclear weapons in defense of its sovereignty. US nuclear power Illustration: Liu Rui/GT
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |