12/25/2023 0 Comments Peerguardian 2 download vistaUnder XP, files copied so fast that I couldn’t really read robocopy’s progress meter under Vista, I could sometimes count to 5 as the progress meter went from 34.6 to 34.7% complete.īoot times: It took Vista more than twice as long to boot my computer as XP does. I have a robocopy batch file that mirrors my MP3 drive to a drive on my file server. Even copying files from one disk to another on my local machine took long enough to go downstairs and make a pot of coffee. Copying an album of mp3s from my Vista desktop to my file server could take 20 minutes, whereas under XP it’d take less than a minute. Network\Disk Throughput: God forbid I actually wanted to move files from point A to point B in Vista. Open another drive that you want to move some files to and wait… wait… wait… for the subfolders to be listed. Click on a disk and wait… wait… wait… before the contents were shown. Sadly, actually using Explorer under Vista was a pain in the ass. There were dozens of tweaks that made Vista so much easier to use, and even prettier to look at. Under XP, I hardly see the splash screen.Įxplorer: I just loved Windows Explorer under Vista. Word: Under Vista, it took Word 2007 around 50 seconds to open to my computer. Interestingly, the Vista encode was done with all other applications closed, while the XP encode was done with Outlook and the aforementioned virtual machine open. Using the same settings, my total encode time under Windows XP: 2 hours, 47 minutes, 51 seconds. When I reinstalled XP, I ripped my own copy of The Bourne Identity. The total time to encode the film under Vista: 14 hours, 53 minutes, 29 seconds. I ripped it using DVD Decrypter, then set up AutoGK to encode it using the “2 CD” setting, with everything else set to “Auto”. But generally speaking, it’s much snappier in XP than Vista.ĪutoGK: A friend of mine lent me her copy of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Don’t get me wrong, Outlook still chokes on large HTML emails. I often could delete a message in Outlook, wait several seconds, open Internet Explorer, manually type the address to my Exchange server into the address bar, login to OWA, and read a few messages… before Outlook had recovered from deleting that message! Using Outlook 2007 under Windows XP is like using a whole new program. Things were so bad under Vista that I’d usually get sick of waiting for Outlook and open Internet Explorer and use OWA instead. But I subscribe to around 20 RSS feeds and a few mailing lists, so at any given time I usually have 700 new messages waiting on me. This wouldn’t be so bad if I only had 3 or 4 emails in my inbox. I’d delete that message, too and wait… and wait… and wait… for the next message to come up. So I would delete that message… and wait… and wait… and wait… for another 30 seconds to a minute for the next message to appear. But under Vista, using Outlook was a nightmare: you’d click on a message and wait… and wait… and wait… usually around 30 seconds, but sometimes up to a minute, before the message would appear in the reading pane. In fact, I’d just be lost without Outlook. ![]() Outlook: If there’s one program I use dozens of times a day, every day, it’s Microsoft Outlook. Under Windows XP, Virtual PC 2007 uses around 5-15% of my CPU cycles, with around 9% or 10% being the average. When I went back to XP, I decided that it was simply easier to install Virtual PC 2007 and reuse the existing virtual machine (rather than install all the BT apps on my system). That’s right, if the virtual machine is booted up, but not doing anything, it was using an average of 45% of my CPU cycles. ![]() The only problem? The virtual machine hogged up between 30-60% of my CPU cycles, even sitting at idle. ![]() I installed Windows XP on a virtual machine and got everything set up just the way I like it: the OS stripped down as much as possible, autologin enabled, and a batch file that starts PeerGuardian and uTorrent at boot. Virtual PC: My Bittorrent setup wasn’t compatible with Vista, so I downloaded Virtual PC 2007. Here’s a short list of my woes with Vista: But it should be plenty powerful enough for a desktop operating system, right?Īpparently not. It’s got 2GB of RAM, an ATI Radeon x1300 pro video card and around 500Gb worth of space spread out among several hard drives. My personal computer is an old Northwood Pentium 4 processor with HT. Why? Because Windows Vista is just broken. It’s been a whole lot of fun, but that fun came to an end when you released Windows Vista. You’ve put food on my table and countless trade show t-shirts on my back. And why not? You’ve given me a career selling and supporting your products. For years, I’ve been one of your biggest fans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |